Review by Katelyn Smith
In his first full-length book, Annals of Pornographie: How Porn Became Bad (2016), Brian Watson traces the long history of pornography in the West, reiterating throughout his work the need to place our modern understanding of porn in context. Porn became popularized through the printing press, which allowed cheaper reproductions of obscene texts, and Watson has made use of the modern day printing press for his own description of the obscene, self-publishing his research in e-book format. The book is an expansion of Watson’s masters’ thesis on the Society for the Suppression of Vice (Drew University, 2013), which attempted to regulate and exterminate “smut” in nineteenth-century England, one of the many organizations Watson discusses.
Watson argues the book is an “attempt to trace a history through the ‘underside’ of Western culture, its art, literature, philosophy, sexology, psychology and its changing laws. It is an attempt to explain the modern view—to explain exactly why, where, and how porn became ‘bad’”(9). He disputes the belief that pornography is a modern conception and instead that we must ‘begin at the beginning.’ His history begins with the 14th century Italian Renaissance and Giovanni Boccaccio’s 1353 work, The Decameron. While recognizing the text is not usually labeled pornography, Watson points to its underlying philosophy, humanism (where “living people deserve as much attention as the future world”), claiming that this philosophy would significantly impact the development of porn in the centuries to come (18). Continue reading “Book Review: Annals of Pornographie”
Today, I have the pleasure of offering you a German-language review of the German translation of Emily Nagoski’s Come As You Are: The Surprising New Science That Will Transform Your Sex Life (Simon & Schuster, 2015). A big thanks to our Intern, First Class Hanna Sophie Frey for reading and reviewing this title. This is an experiment for us in offering non-English-language reviews of translated work or non-English-language titles. If you are a reviewer who would be interested in offering such a review we welcome pitches. In the meantime, without further ado here is Hanna Sophie.
~Anna Clutterbuck-Cook, Book Review Editor
In Komm Wie Du Willst, hier in der 2015 erschienenen deutschen Fassung rezensiert, erschafft Emily Nagoski eine einfühlende Wegbeschreibung zur Lust. Von den komplexen Basics über die Macht des Kontext, und die Praxis der Erregung hin zur Ekstase: In vier Teilen gibt sie uns Reisenden Wissenschaft und Fallbeispiele an die Hand und füttert die Neugier auf den Weg selbst.
Du bist normal. Das ist mal eine Ansage. Aber wirklich, Nagoski schafft gleich auf den ersten Seiten Raum für die Akzeptanz des immer anderen Selbst und der nahezu unmöglichen Selbstverständlichkeit der eigenen Schönheit gegenüber gesellschaftlicher Normalitäts- und Perfektionserklärungen. Zum Glück erklärt sie dann auch wieso und warum das weibliche Geschlechtsorgan so schön ist: die Zusammensetzung der Vulva, die Evolution ihrer Formen und sinnlichen Wege, sodass sich ein Bewusstsein mit Wissen füllen kann – und anders herum. Das neue Verstehen lässt sich dank unmittelbaren und alltagstauglichen Übungen in genussvolles Fühlen umsetzen. Continue reading “Book Review: Komm Wie Du Willst”
What makes a person heterosexual? Can heterosexuality be measured in the body? In the brain? Is it discerned and practiced through sexual acts? Emotional attachments? Self-reported desires? Can it be chosen or is it innate? In modern Western culture most individuals are presumed to be heterosexual until they convince us otherwise through acts or affiliations; once the world understands an individual to be homosexual (in the hetero/homosexual landscape bisexuality is routinely elided) — once that individual has crossed “the straight line” into gay or lesbian identity — can that individual return? In The Straight Line: How the Fringe Science of Ex-Gay Therapy Reoriented Sexuality (University of Minnesota Press, 2015) sociologist Tom Waidzunas (Temple University) explores these questions through the lens of ex-gay reorientation therapy status and practices in the United States.
Today, reorientation therapies — a collection of practices that seek to shift a person’s sexual orientation from homosexual toward heterosexual — exist on the fringes of established scientific communities, broadly understood to be both ineffective and often also harmful to patients. Yet seventy years ago, in the postwar period, reorientation therapies were considered to be a cornerstone of treatment for those experiencing homosexual desires or engaging in homosexual acts. How, then, did a collection of practices once considered standard practice get pushed to the edges (if not off the edge) of legitimate scientific understanding? And, perhaps more importantly, how did the journey of reorientation therapy from the center to the margins of psychiatric care in the United States change how Americans understand the nature of human sexuality?
Waidzunas sets out to answer this question using a blend of sociological, historical, and queer theoretical methods. Drawing on archival research and interviews with key figures, he traces how the political agitation of gay-affirmative and anti-gay social movements struggled within and around the mental health professions succeeded over the course of half a century in redrawing the boundaries of accepted scientific knowledge. In response to the reorientation community’s belief that sexual orientation can be changed, gay-affirmative therapists and activists have increasingly relied on notions of fixity: the notion that one’s body carries an innate true orientation that can be measured and remains stable throughout one’s life even as personal identity and community affiliation may change. While effective in marginalizing reorientation practices hostile to homosexual desires, the notion of a fixed sexual orientation is scientifically fraught (how to measure it?) and problematically cis male-centered (most assertions of sexual fixity are rooted in studies involving penises and porn). Ultimately — without discounting the harms done to individuals in ex-gay therapy — The Straight Line challenges gay-affirming readers to re-examine their assumptions that the demise of reorientation science is an untempered win for LGBT rights. Continue reading “Book Review: The Straight Line”
“God and sex seem to occupy distinct and separate spaces within our communities and our psyches,” sociologist Kelsy Burke observes in her introduction to Christians Under Covers: Evangelicals and Sexual Pleasure on the Internet (University of California Press, 2016). In contemporary American discourse, “religious pleasures and sexual pleasures are often pitted against each other in den debates over contentious social issues like homosexuality, premarital sex, and pornography” (2). Yet what Burke found, in her ethnographic study of Internet-based discussions about faith and sexuality, was that for conservative evangelical Christians, religious commitment and sexual pleasure are deeply intertwined. As Burke evocatively puts it:
Users [of Christian sexuality websites] portray their marital beds as crowded. Their choices appear to be (or at least attempt to be) influenced by God, who celebrates sexual pleasure for married Christians; Satan, who thwarts sexual pleasure for married Christians; and the websites themselves …monitor[ing] these desires and behaviors through feedback, providing credibility for some acts while condemning others (3).
For this dissertation turned monograph, Burke identified sixteen blogs, eighteen online stores, and two message boards created for the purpose of putting human sexuality into Christian context. During the early 2010s she was an observer-participant in these spaces, “lurking” (with permission of website administrators) in online discussions as well as designing an online survey that reached 768 respondents and conducting 44 one-to-one interviews. Participants in the study were overwhelmingly white, (heterosexually) married evangelical Protestants.
Based on the data she collected, Burke makes two interrelated arguments about conservative evangelical heterosexuality at the dawn of the twenty-first century.
Continue reading “Book Review: Christians Under Covers”