The Institute of Medical Ethics and BMJ are looking for the next Editor-in-Chief who can continue to shape the Journal of Medical Ethics into a dynamic resource for a rapidly evolving field. Candidates should be active in the field, keen to facilitate international perspectives and maintain an awareness of trends and hot topics. The successful candidate will act as an ambassador for the journal supporting both pioneering authors and academics publishing their first papers. The candidate will also actively promote and strengthen the journal whilst upholding the highest ethical standards of professional practice. The editor will work with IME to promote research and scholarship in medical ethics and attend IME board meetings regularly.
International and joint applications are welcomed. Interviews will be held in December 2017. Term of office is five years; the role will take 12-15 hours a week. Contact Richard Sands (firstname.lastname@example.org) for more information and to apply with your CV and cover letter outlining your interest and your vision for the future development of the journal.
Application deadline: 31 October 2017; Interviews: December 2017
Start date: 1 June 2018 (handover from February 2018)
About Journal of Medical Ethics
Journal of Medical Ethics launched in 1975 and has since become a leading international journal that reflects the whole field of medical ethics. Publishing Original Research, Extended Essays, Current Controversies, Feature articles, Review articles and more, the journal is relevant to health care professionals, members of clinical ethics committees, medical ethics professionals, researchers and bioscientists, policy makers and patients.
The journal regularly publishes special collections on current hot topics and key conversations in the field including: Circumcision, DSM-5, Stem cell derived gametes and Withholding artificial nutrition & hydration.
Journal of Medical Ethics also offers an interactive blog with analytical discussions from various scholars and regular updates on @JME_BMJ further contributing to the latest debate and dialogue.
Being an Editor for a BMJ Journal
As Editor of Journal of Medical Ethics you will benefit from the following:
Competitive Annual Honorarium
Free online subscription to the journal for you and your Editorial Team
Access to exclusive BMJ content, including The BMJ and BMJ Learning
Full training and support; from publishing processes to social media
The chance to shape the field and play a role in the development of the field
Have a positive effect on the careers of fellow researchers
Interact with the latest research from all over the world
About the Institute of Medical Ethics and BMJ
Journal of Medical Ethics is co-owned by the Institute of Medical Ethics and BMJ. IME is a charitable organisation dedicated to improving education and debate in medical ethics. BMJ advances healthcare worldwide by sharing knowledge and expertise to improve experiences and outcomes.
The Daily Dose is delighted to announce that our founder, Brandy Schillace PhD, is the new editor of Medical Humanities!
Dr Schillace is Senior Research Associate and Public Engagement Fellow for the Dittrick Museum of Medical History, College of Arts and Sciences, at Case Western Reserve University, US. For ten years, she managed the medical anthropology journal, Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, and edited its first medical humanities special issue. Her recent books include the co-edited collection UNNATURAL REPRODUCTIONS, on “monstrous” birth across time and genre (Cambria), DEATH’S SUMMER COAT, exploring cultural approaches to death and dying (E&T UK, Pegasus US), and CLOCKWORK FUTURES, a social history of technology and the “steampunk” aesthetics of invention (Pegasus, US).An accomplished medical humanities scholar, speaker and author, she continues to serve as chief editor of the medical humanities and review blog MedHum | DailyDose along with this new role and her work in museums. Dr Schillace will take over as editor from Deborah Bowman from 1 July 2017.
We as a staff are excited to share this release with BMJ Blogs Medical Humanities–which offers, with the print journal, an inclusive space for discussing the arts and humanities as they relate to health and illness. Anna McFarlane, an affiliate of the Medical Humanities Research Centre at the University of Glasgow, recently accepted the role of BMJ Medical Humanities blog curator. Medical Humanities is an official journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics that reflects the whole field of medical humanities. It features articles on various aspects of the delivery of healthcare and the formulation of public health policy.
Dr Brandy Schillace says:“I am passionate about the intersections of medicine and humanities, and have always been impressed by the BMJ family of journals’ combination of clinical relevance and intellectual curiosity. I am excited to lead the journal and build on the accomplishments of the outgoing editor Deborah Bowman in this important and evolving area.”
Dr Wing May Kong, Chair of Trustees, IME, says :”The Institute of Medical Ethics is delighted to welcome Dr Brandy Schillace as the new Editor-in-Chief for Medical Humanities. We see medical humanities as an exciting and hugely important academic discipline and look forward to watching MH continue to grow and flourish under Brandy’s leadership whilst building on the excellent work done by her predecessor, Professor Deborah Bowman.”
Allison Lang, Publishing Director at BMJ, says: “We are delighted to appoint Dr Brandy Schillace, a well respected medical humanities scholar, who shares our vision for advancing the academic and international reputation of the journal, and increasing its relevance to healthcare professionals and others. Brandy also brings a wealth of media experience and we look forward to working with her to bring rich and stimulating content to the journal.”
For further information, please contact BMJ’s media relations team:
Medical Humanities is a leading international journal that reflects the whole field of medical humanities. It features articles on the delivery of healthcare and the formulation of public health policy relevant to healthcare professionals, humanities and arts scholars, social scientists and policy-makers, medical educators, and patients. It is one of the 60 specialist journals published by BMJ. For more information, visit: mh.bmj.com
BMJ is a healthcare knowledge provider that aims to advance healthcare worldwide by sharing knowledge and expertise to improve experiences, outcomes and value. For a full list of BMJ products and services, please visit bmj.com/company
About The Institute of Medical Ethics
The Institute of Medical Ethics (IME) is a charitable organisation dedicated to improving education and debate in medical ethics. Our mission is “promoting and supporting the impartial study and understanding of medical ethics and its integration into clinical practice through education, research, and publication”. We are currently involved in organising conferences, providing grants to students interested in medical ethics and in a project to support and develop medical ethics and law teaching in UK medical schools.
NEWS AND NOTES: Positions open for the Medical Humanities journal (BMJ). Medical Humanities launched in 2000 and has since become a leading international journal that reflects the whole field of medical humanities.
Publishing original research, case studies, review essays and more; the journal aspires to encourage a high academic standard for this evolving and developing subject. The journal has recently broadened its scope by publishing an additional two guest edited Themed Editions a year focusing on key conversations in the field. Recent issues have included ‘Critical Medical Humanities’ and ‘Science Fiction and Medical Humanities’. Medical Humanities also offers an interactive blog with film, poetry and book reviews and regular updates on @MedHums_BMJ further contributing to the latest debate and dialogue.
The journal is currently seeking to fill two positions:
1.Editor-in-Chief Medical Humanities
The Institute of Medical Ethics and BMJ are looking for the next Editor-in-Chief who can continue to shape Medical Humanities into a dynamic resource for a rapidly evolving field. Candidates should be active in the field, keen to facilitate international perspectives and maintain an awareness of trends and hot topics. The successful candidate will act as an ambassador for the journal supporting both pioneering authors and academics publishing their first papers. The candidate will also actively promote and strengthen the journal whilst upholding the highest ethical standards of professional practice. International and joint applications are welcomed. Interviews will be held on 24th March 2017. Term of office is 5 years; the role will take 12-15 hours a week. Contact Kelly Horwood (email@example.com) for more information and to apply with your CV and cover letter outlining your interest and your vision for future development of the journal. Application deadline: 24th February 2017. Start date: June 2017
2. Blog Curator and Books Editor at Medical Humanities.
Position: Blog Curator/Books Editor
It is a single, combined role as all book reviews are published on the Blog. The role involves: Commissioning and editing content, including reviews, for the Medical Humanities Blog; maintaining the Medical Humanities Blog and updating it regularly (currently on a weekly schedule, but this could be flexible within reason); liaising with publishers to receive new titles and organise reviews of relevant books for the Blog; contributing to the editorial team (comprising the editor-in-chief, associate editors and BMJ Publishing staff) that leads and manages both the journal and Blog, including attending the annual editorial team meeting; curating the content of the Blog to reflect the journal’s identity, priorities and interests; working with social media platforms to provide a coherent online presence for Medical Humanities. The role is flexible and can be adapted according to the successful applicant’s interests and availability. On average, the role takes approximately 4-6 hours per week. If you are interested in the role, you are welcome to contact the Editor-in-Chief, Prof. Deborah Bowman, for an informal and confidential discussion. Her email address is firstname.lastname@example.org.
This Monday we have a piece from Ekaterina Prosandeeva, MA, PhD Candidate at the University of Eastern Finland in the Philosophical faculty, School of Humanities. She writes, “My current doctoral work is concerned with the binary of norm and deviance and the conveyance of the subjective experience of mental illness in the contemporary English literature. The doctoral research is supported by the North Karelia Regional Fund of the Finnish Cultural Foundation.” You can contact her via email at email@example.com, or on Facebook or LinkedIn.
There is a tendency among the general public to consider narratives of mental illness a highly specialized sort of reading. Such an attitude solidifies the us/them binary: one denies what seems irrelevant to him or her claiming (or rather assuring oneself) that it is none of his or her concern. This is a vicious circle: on the one hand, the entire issue of ignorance arises precisely from a lack of desire to be concerned and, on the other hand, the refusal to be concerned is a direct consequence of being ignorant. I chose to study narratives of mental illness in part in order to break this circle and to demonstrate that a “non-involvement” attitude is limiting in many ways.
The first thing I found out in the course of my research is that our opinions and judgments are often formed by superficial representations of different disorders. It is remarkable that such representations operate both ways: some disorders are demonized to the extent that people suffering from them are pictured as extremely hostile others, while the names of other disorders enter our everyday small talk and thus depart from their actual clinical picture.
Schizophrenia is one of those demonized ones, the realm of fear and the unknown. When Henry Cockburn, the co-author of the Henry’s Demons memoir1, was deinstitutionalized he managed to resume his art studies. Henry told some of his fellow students that he had schizophrenia but the response he received was: “Oh, do you have a split personality?”2 It is likely that the young people confused schizophrenia with a multiple or dissociative identity disorder, as it is pictured by Daniel Keyes3, or else, shaped by a stereotype and a familiar word combination they had happened to overhear somewhere. Thus, stereotypes produce distorted representations of some conditions and further contaminate the labels produced by the always-already unreliable language that has its own limits.
The unreliability of language is the second important thing to take into account. We can look up schizophrenia in an etymology dictionary to find a literal translation from Greek— “a splitting of mind”. Thus it is fairly easy to confuse it with multiple identity disorder if one fails to get to the “splitting of psychic functioning” that Bleuler implied while coining the word schizophrenia.4 Or else, if one fails to look through, say, Cockburns’ Henry Demons or Daniel Keyes’ The Minds of Billy Milligan. Upon reading the mentioned stories, it becomes fairly hard to confuse Henry Cockburn and Billy Milligan.
While schizophrenia is a demonized diagnosis, one of those used in our idle talk on an everyday basis is depression. In his book (an extract also published in Unholy Ghost collection) William Styron compares “depression” to a slug, saying that it pretends to be non-malevolent and prevents a general awareness of its own horrible intensity.5 The etymology of depression is as ambiguous as that of schizophrenia with its seme of being “pressed down” or “weighed down”. The structure of the word and the inaccurate use of it scarcely give a full picture of clinical depression. Neither does the impersonal dryness of hospital records.
What can help then to reduce the ambiguity and lift the veil at least a little bit on mental illness? I believe that a story is what makes understanding possible and reduces the ignorance about human conditions. Jacques Derrida suggested an idea that the words are found “under erasure”: the word is not accurate, he says, and we cross it out, yet it remains visible because we cannot do without it.6 Although “depression” is inaccurate and our stories are mediated by language, such stories convey the experience proving that it is not isolated and incomprehensible. It would be great luck to use a perfect language that could immediately and naturally convey our thoughts and experiences but we live in no fairy tale and we need to come to terms with the imperfect language we have and take incoherent stories into account. As Joshua Wolf Schenk says in his essay in Unholy Ghost, he hoped for a “direct communication” but when he spoke, “it was with stumbles and stammers”.7 A coherent speech can hardly represent a translation of a fragmented experience—even an incoherent one often fails. Furthermore, the majority of stories people may tell are far from being those of full recovery, though the latter are more often published. An assumption that only coherent narratives of full recovery count can be discouraging for a writer.
Therefore, the third and the fourth issues I would like to emphasize are the myths: that of coherence and that of a full recovery. In other words, illness stories are not and should not be the stories with happy ending. The last line of Henry’s Demons reads: “I sit under the tree which speaks to me and gives me hope”. I know a reviewer8 who claims that this line reminds him of a horror movie. Inappropriate as it is, this claim demands a “completed” story and underestimates the open-ended stories, no less worthy than the former.
1. Cockburn, Henry and Patrick Cockburn. Henry’s Demons: A Father and Son’s Journey Out of Madness. New York: Scribner, 2011.
2. Cockburn, Henry. “If I say I’m schizophrenic people reply, ‘So you’ve got a split personality’”. Independent November 27, 2012. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/features/henry-cockburn-if-i-say-im-schizophrenic-people-reply-so-youve-got-a-split-personality-8360497.html
3. Keyes, Daniel. The Minds of Billy Milligan. New York: Random House, 1981.
4. Bleuler, Eugen. Dementia Praecox: Or the Group of Schizophrenias. New York: International Universities Press, 1911.
5. Styron, William. Darkness Visible: A Memoir of Madness. New York: Vintage, 1990.
6. Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Spivak. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
7. Schenk, Joshua Wolf. ‘A Melancholy of Mine’. Unholy Ghost: Writers on Depression. Nell Casey, ed. New York: Perennial, 2002. 242-255.
8. Garner, Dwight. Phantoms of the Mind, No Longer Schocking but No Less Haunting. The New York Times, Feb. 1, 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/02/books/02book.html